IXALIT

Welcome to my blog!

I have also a couple side blogs. They include:

  1. @stevebucky-art - fan art archive of Steve, Bucky, Chris, Sebastian, and all the pairings between them. There’s a tagging system for (hopefully) easy navigation. 5 posts per day (sometimes more) and lots of super talented artists. Sometimes NSFW
  2. @hydrarts- Hydra Trash Party (and associated topics) fan art archive. Warnings for dubcon, noncon, torture, and the usual dead dove warnings that come with HTP. Almost always NSFW
  3. @ixalitwrites - all my writing that’s on this blog in one place with good tagging so it’s easier to navigate and find things.

My content: #ixalitwrites #ixalitpoems #ixalitplaylists #ixalitnonfiction #my posts

I write A/B/O, daddy kink, RPF, and darker themes sometimes. Always appropriately tagged and warned.

Please do not follow me if you’re under 18

Send me an ask if you want :)

ao3topshipsbracket:

AO3 Top Relationships Bracket- Round 2 Side 1

image
image

Blackbeard | Edward Teach/Stede Bonnet (Our Flag Means Death) vs James “Bucky” Barnes/Steve Rogers (Marvel)

Blackbeard/Stede

Bucky/Steve

See Results

This poll is a celebration of fandom history; we’re aware that there are certain issues with many of the listed pairings and sources, but they are a part of that history. Please do not take this as an endorsement, and refrain from harassment.

the-haiku-bot:

pyjama-llama:

skaiandestiny:

ilikeit-art:

image

The mechanics behind it are pretty simple too:

  1. The white-hot liquid glass is hot enough to light the branch on fire.
  2. While the branch is catching on fire, the liquid glass coats it completely, trapping the plant matter away from oxygen, and it can’t continue burning without oxygen.

That’s how you catch the branch in the state of “plant catching on fire”, without advancing to the “plant burnt” state.

The white-hot liquid

glass is hot enough to light

the branch on fire.

Beep boop! I look for accidental haiku posts. Sometimes I mess up.

(via mel0dyoftears)

magicgirlboss:

andromerot:

what is art about? blood. what is love about? blood. what is hate about? blood. what is sex about? blood. what is history about? blood. what am i about? blood. what is blood about? idk ask a biologist i guess

hi, biologist here! blood is about gay sex

(via whitenikes)

oldschoolfrp:
“ neil-gaiman:
“ curiouslyhigh:
“ iambettyjean:
“ “Science fiction, double feature.
”
The Rocky Horror Picture Show (1975)
”
THIS is the montage I’ve been waiting my life for.
”
Remembering how long it took me starting as a 14 year old... oldschoolfrp:
“ neil-gaiman:
“ curiouslyhigh:
“ iambettyjean:
“ “Science fiction, double feature.
”
The Rocky Horror Picture Show (1975)
”
THIS is the montage I’ve been waiting my life for.
”
Remembering how long it took me starting as a 14 year old... oldschoolfrp:
“ neil-gaiman:
“ curiouslyhigh:
“ iambettyjean:
“ “Science fiction, double feature.
”
The Rocky Horror Picture Show (1975)
”
THIS is the montage I’ve been waiting my life for.
”
Remembering how long it took me starting as a 14 year old... oldschoolfrp:
“ neil-gaiman:
“ curiouslyhigh:
“ iambettyjean:
“ “Science fiction, double feature.
”
The Rocky Horror Picture Show (1975)
”
THIS is the montage I’ve been waiting my life for.
”
Remembering how long it took me starting as a 14 year old... oldschoolfrp:
“ neil-gaiman:
“ curiouslyhigh:
“ iambettyjean:
“ “Science fiction, double feature.
”
The Rocky Horror Picture Show (1975)
”
THIS is the montage I’ve been waiting my life for.
”
Remembering how long it took me starting as a 14 year old... oldschoolfrp:
“ neil-gaiman:
“ curiouslyhigh:
“ iambettyjean:
“ “Science fiction, double feature.
”
The Rocky Horror Picture Show (1975)
”
THIS is the montage I’ve been waiting my life for.
”
Remembering how long it took me starting as a 14 year old... oldschoolfrp:
“ neil-gaiman:
“ curiouslyhigh:
“ iambettyjean:
“ “Science fiction, double feature.
”
The Rocky Horror Picture Show (1975)
”
THIS is the montage I’ve been waiting my life for.
”
Remembering how long it took me starting as a 14 year old... oldschoolfrp:
“ neil-gaiman:
“ curiouslyhigh:
“ iambettyjean:
“ “Science fiction, double feature.
”
The Rocky Horror Picture Show (1975)
”
THIS is the montage I’ve been waiting my life for.
”
Remembering how long it took me starting as a 14 year old... oldschoolfrp:
“ neil-gaiman:
“ curiouslyhigh:
“ iambettyjean:
“ “Science fiction, double feature.
”
The Rocky Horror Picture Show (1975)
”
THIS is the montage I’ve been waiting my life for.
”
Remembering how long it took me starting as a 14 year old... oldschoolfrp:
“ neil-gaiman:
“ curiouslyhigh:
“ iambettyjean:
“ “Science fiction, double feature.
”
The Rocky Horror Picture Show (1975)
”
THIS is the montage I’ve been waiting my life for.
”
Remembering how long it took me starting as a 14 year old...

oldschoolfrp:

neil-gaiman:

curiouslyhigh:

iambettyjean:

Science fiction, double feature.

The Rocky Horror Picture Show (1975)

THIS is the montage I’ve been waiting my life for.

Remembering how long it took me starting as a 14 year old to track down information on each movie referenced, in the days before videos (let alone DVDs or streaming movies or any way of watching things that wasn’t a festival at the Scala Cinema or late at night on BBC2…



This post is a public service

(via lauralot89)

Asker Potrait
Anonymous asked

*Trigger Warning* Why is The Rocky Horror Picture Show popular with the kinky and queer communities? I'm not part of those communities and I don't get it, please explain. It seems to me to be a story in which the kinky queer people are literally not human and try to recruit (and arguably rape by fraud) "normal" people.

ixalit answered

pervocracy:

Yes, but it’s also a story where kinky queer people are powerful and cool and sexy and fun, and ultimately the straight characters sing about how much freer they feel in a corset fishnets pool orgy.  (And then the house, uh, is a spaceship and it takes off?  Okay.)  It’s also relevant that the movie was written by a nonbinary person; I think the intent was not to demonize kinky queer people, but to tell a story featuring them that also had elements of classic schlock horror and sci-fi movies. 

And remember that this was the 70s, when sympathetic queer characters were thin on the ground, the distinction between “transvestite” and “transsexual” was not crisply defined, and the popular understanding of the difference between “seduction” and “rape” was even less nuanced than it is today.  (Also, the “homosexual agenda” narrative of gay recruitment wouldn’t come around until the 90s.)  This doesn’t make everything okay but it’s important context.

And I’d argue that some of the bad stuff in it is intentionally transgressive–isn’t saying “people who don’t conform to traditional gender and sexual roles are dangerous perverts,” but “you think we’re dangerous perverts? oh honey, you have no idea.”

Yeah, I’m defensive.  This movie means something to me, on a level that’s not apparent on the screen, because I started going to midnight showings when I was fifteen.  And it–counting the audience participation and shadow cast, because you really have to, there’s no point to watching this movie quietly at home–was probably my first experience with queerness being fun.  I already knew it was possible to not be straight, but only as a tragic existence condemned to the shadows.  Rocky Horror wasn’t the first time I learned two men could kiss, but it was the first time I saw two men kiss in front of a crowd that was cheering them on.

So, okay, not “therefore, Rocky Horror is flawless, QED,” but that’s why people like it.  It’s an all-ages queer event you can attend without declaring yourself queer, it’s an introduction to queerness as silly and naughty instead of always being Very Serious Business, and you can throw stuff at the screen.

kittwalker:

slowlikehoney1996:

grounding techniques, ok 5 things i can see. ugly man. shitty palm tree. clear evidence of air pollution. conservative bumper stickers. roadkill. why do i feel worse

I used to do the 5 things you see, 4 things you hear etc with my daughter when she was spiralling, but it had a low success rate. Just didn’t engage her brain, was too easy to just list shit things that made her feel shit.

I had to get creative.

Now we do shit like:


5 things you can see that you could easily steal without being noticed

4 things you think might be sticky if you licked them

3 things that you could fit in your mouth at once

2 inanimate objects that in another dimension, might fall in love

1 thing you can see that isn’t made of cheese, but would be better if was


Obviously not those ones every time, I gotta keep mixing things up, else she doesn’t have to really focus. Your mileage may vary, but it mostly works for us.

(via homicidal-bunny)

01018000:

I want you to write for pleasure—to play. Just listen to the sounds and rhythms of the sentences you write and play with them, like a kid with a kazoo. This isn’t “free writing,” but it’s similar in that you’re relaxing control: you’re encouraging the words themselves—the sounds of them, the beats and echoes—to lead you on. For the moment, forget all the good advice that says good style is invisible, good art conceals art. Show off! Use the whole orchestra our wonderful language offers us! Write it for children, if that’s the way you can give yourself permission to do it. Write it for your ancestors. Use any narrating voice you like. If you’re familiar with a dialect or accent, use it instead of vanilla English. Be very noisy, or be hushed. Try to reproduce the action in the jerky or flowing movement of the words. Make what happens happen in the sounds of the words, the rhythms of the sentences. Have fun, cut loose, play around, repeat, invent, feel free.

Ursula K. Le Guin, Steering The Craft

(via dontcallmebree)

Load More